|
New Study: Over 500,000 Women Affected by Post-Abortion
Syndrome
Elliot Institute: August 23, 2000
Springfield, IL --
Pro-choice researchers writing in the August issue of the Archives
of General Psychiatry have acknowledged that some women experience
post-abortion syndrome (PAS). The research team, led by Dr. Brenda
Major, diagnosed PAS among 1.4 percent of a sample of women who had
abortions two years previously. Critics of abortion are elated by
this admission but insist the researchers have only spotted the "tip
of the iceberg."
"Even at the low rate
identified in this study, the impact is tremendous," said Dr.
Vincent Rue, who first proposed PAS as a variant of posttraumatic
stress disorder (PTSD) in 1981. "With 40 million abortions since
1972, this would translate into 560,000 cases of PAS."
Rue also notes that many
women in the study reported psychiatric disorders that are less
severe than full-blown PAS. Twenty percent of the women in the
Majors study experienced clinical depression. Also, when asked if
they would do it all over again, 31 percent reported that they would
not have chosen abortion or were uncertain. "Since ambivalence is a
good predictor of postabortion problems, " said Rue, "it is likely
that many of these women are having post-abortion symptoms that
simply fall short of full-blown PAS."
Unlike Rue, the Major's
research team focused on the absence of problems among the majority
of post-abortive women. They concluded that "most women do not
experience psychological problems or regret about their abortion two
years post-abortion, but some do. Those who do tend to be women with
a prior history of depression." Dr. David Reardon, who directs a
post-abortion research and education organization known as the
Elliot Institute, sees this association with prior depression as
evidence of the need for abortion providers to provide better
screening and counseling. "Clearly, this study shows that
abortionists should be screening for a history of depression," he
said. "It also confirms a large body of earlier research that shows
that prior psychological problems are more likely to be made worse
by abortion, not better."
Reardon says that Major's
study has merit, but he insists that it is inappropriate to conclude
that abortion is a benign experience for most women. "The biggest
shortcomings of this study are the high dropout and refusal rates,"
he said. "Even though women were offered payment to participate, 15
percent of the women who were initially approached refused to
participate, and 50 percent of those who originally participated
refused to participate in follow-up interviews. Research has found
that those women who are most likely to experience negative
post-abortion reactions are also least likely to participate in
post-abortion research."
This criticism is
supported by a recent study which found that women who declined to
participate in post-abortion follow-up interviews most closely
matched the characteristics of those women who experienced the most
post-abortion distress. Dr. Hanna Sderberg, the lead author of that
study, reported that "for many of the women, the reason for
non-participation seemed to be a sense of guilt and remorse that
they did not wish to discuss. An answer very often given was: 'I do
not want to talk about it. I just want to forget'."
Conducting interviews one
year after the abortions, Sderberg's research team found that
approximately 60 percent of the women in their sample of 854 women
had experienced emotional distress after their abortions. This
distress was classified as "severe," warranting professional
psychiatric attention, among 16 percent of the women. In addition,
over 70 percent stated that they would never consider an abortion
again if they faced an unwanted pregnancy.
Reardon and Rue agree
that several other findings reported by Major's team also deserve
greater attention. "Major's study clearly demonstrates the presence
of delayed reactions," Reardon said. "She found that negative
feelings and dissatisfaction with the abortion decision increased
with time-even among her final, lower-risk population. In addition,
only a minority of women reported positive emotions, and on average
the women reported no beneficial effect from their abortions. This
general ambivalence about their abortions, combined with a trend
toward increasing negative reactions, contradicts the claim that
abortion is generally beneficial to women."
Though Major and her
colleagues focused mostly on the psychological effects of abortion,
they also found that 17 percent of women experienced physical
problems such as bleeding or pelvic infection associated with the
abortion. "This rate is much higher than abortion providers admit,"
Rue said. "Clinic counselors rarely inform women of this rate of
physical complications."

Post
Abortion Syndrome From A Doctor’s Viewpoint By Dr. Stephen
Edmondson
Dr. Stephen Edmondson has been in private
psychiatric practice in Atlanta for 19 years. He attended Medical
College of Georgia at Augusta and served his internship at
Piedmont Hospital. His first year of residency was at University
Hospital in Baltimore and his last two years was at Emory
University Hospital. He then served for two years as a U.S. Navy
Medical Officer. In his years of private practice, he has treated
many women who have post-abortion
problems.
Q: What is
Post-Abortion Syndrome (PAS)? Doctor: Post-Abortion Syndrome is a category of Post
Traumatic Stress Disorder, either acute or delayed. With the acute
form, symptoms appear within six months of trauma and are usually
resolved within six months. With the delayed form, symptoms last
longer and the onset is much later. Most of the PAS category that I
have seen occurred long after the abortion was done, many months to
several years later.
This disorder follows a
specific "stressor" event, which is outside the normal experience
and often has elements of a threat to life at some level. Most of
these cases involve one specific incident. The disorder seems to be
more severe and lasts longer when the stressor is of human design,
which is certainly the case in an abortion picture.
Q: Is
PAS recognized within the medical
community? Doctor: It is
being widely discussed and is being accepted now. If a physician
sees someone in the aftermath of an abortion and diagnoses Post
Traumatic Stress Disorder, with abortion as the stressor, it would
not be questioned. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder only became a
listing (in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders) in 1981 or 1982 in response to the
combat-related disorders (of Vietnam
veterans).
Q:
Why does PAS tend to manifest itself so long after the abortion
takes place? Doctor: With an
abortion, which might have carried with it a good deal of
uncertainty and pressure, the individual is swept along without
sorting out and thinking through issues involved. In all major
crisis situations, there is a kind of helplessness, and people are
very suggestive. Pressure can persuade the individual to go ahead
and get the abortion done. After it is over, the interest is in
going ahead with the person's life and forgetting about it. Denial
comes into play. The person doesn't want to think or talk about it;
she wants to keep it secret. There is a sealing over of the whole
experience. Denial, the death of a child or a close relative,
repression, or erasing from conscious awareness can lead the
individual to not think of the abortion for some time afterwards.
But to do this requires a good bit of mental
energy.
Q:
What are some common symptoms signaling
PAS? Doctor: Denial is one of
the aspects of PAS. When memories do begin to come back, there may
be dreams of the baby or recollections of the abortion clinic. Often
guilt and grief might begin to appear. Depression is one of the
first signs, along with anxiety and irritability. The woman may
experience emotional numbing: a feeling of going through the motions
without being emotionally connected. There may be withdrawal in a
marriage (or boyfriend) relationship, acting out in the form of
sexual activity, or sexual responsiveness may be blunted. Sometimes
we see repeated pregnancies, as if the individual is trying to
replace the aborted baby. There may be difficulty concentrating,
inefficiency in work, and a blunting of
memory.
Q: Is
there a relation between PAS and child
abuse? Doctor: Depression,
irritability and difficulty coping would make it hard to deal with
children. With all cases of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder,
frustration tolerance is down, and the individual is likely to
explode in anger at limited provocation and might well hurt
someone.
I read a journal article
in which the writer made the point that people have a strong natural
drive to recreate themselves by having children, but in our time
there has been a progressive devaluing of children. Once we begin to
abort them, their value declines even further. This undercuts the
desire to recreate our selves. This devaluation of children can be
tied to our national decrease in childbearing, increase in unwanted
pregnancies and subsequent abortions, as well as the marked increase
in child abuse.
Q: Is
there usually an event or situation that triggers
PAS? Doctor: There are some
particular things that tend to bring back an awareness of the
abortion, such as the woman's admission to a hospital or going into
an operating room, her child being taken in for surgery, the birth
of her child or seeing a friend's newborn or the death of a child,
close relative or friend.
Q: Is
every woman who has had an abortion likely to develop
PAS? Doctor: Some women may
work through the aftermath of abortion with the aid of a support
group, their church or family and friends. But I believe the only
person who would not be affected by an abortion would be someone
with severe character disorder. Such an individual can form no real
attachment to other human beings and therefore has no feeling for
how her actions affect others.
The better a woman's
capacity to repress, the longer the disorder will be put off, but
the greater the eventual stress. Some women can talk quite glibly
about the issue. They build support groups and are not consciously
bothered by their abortions, but they spend a great deal of time and
energy justifying them.
Q: How is PAS
treated and resolved? Doctor: I review symptoms carefully with no
prejudgments. I take the person back through a life review and
interview close relatives. I see the patient frequently, but it is
important not to overwhelm them by bringing too much to the surface
at once. In the process of resolving feelings about the abortion,
the individual must understand how and why it happened. The patient
must look at how she handles her life.
Q: Is
grieving for the aborted child an important aspect of
therapy? Doctor: Yes, but one
aspect of denial is the idea that the aborted baby was not a person.
For a person in crisis, it is easy to buy into the idea that the
fetus is just a piece of tissue. But this tissue in the woman's
uterus is not in any sense her tissue. The fetus is a unique
individual: there has never been one like it, there will never be
another. In order to resolve grief, the woman must admit that a
child was aborted.
Q:
How would you advise a woman suffering from
PAS? Doctor: She should turn
to those who are pro-life, support groups and post-abortion
counselors who can help restore the woman's sense of the meaning of
life. Abortion delivers a body blow to the meaning of
life.
This article originally
appeared in the American Association of Pro-Life Pediatricians
Newsletter, Autumn 1990. Reprinted by permission in the
Association for Interdisciplinary Research in Values and Social
Change Newsletter, Vol. 3, No. 4 - Winter 1991
|